Tag Archive: weather radar


Streetcars — electric — run on rails

The trolly attaches to overhead wires — and that powers the street car

They are building radar evading stealth bombers and sending people to the moon and probes further

Ionospheric heaters are a reality — changing weather is a reality

Monitoring every corner of the earth and having it read and understood by trillion byte per second computers has arrived

Why is all the good technology only ever for the military and never for ending the problems of the people who fund the research labour and development of that technology ?


new world order nutjobs

scottso360 | Apr 20, 2011


control
dominique m | Apr 20, 2011

I was driving back to University from my hometown late on a Thursday evening (approximately 11pm) and had been on the road for about 1.5 hours. I need to note I was on my way to speak with my graduate adviser for an 8am meeting the following morning as I was trying to finish up my Masters degree before noted deadlines in March so I could actually graduate.

This is a New England (Western Mass) town; it was in February – around the time of back to back blizzards with more than 2-3 feet of snow, and alarming snow mounds; enough to obscure vision.

I was descending a back road hill, honestly unaware my car had accelerated so by the bottom of the hill I was on the break. Conveniently, behind a large snow mound (approximately 7 feet high) there was an officer hiding (entrapment???) with his car FACING oncoming traffic. I immediately saw his lights go on (I’m assuming radar) and I stopped not 10 yards from where I saw his lights. Within moments he was behind


All of your excuses and explanations are not germane to the legal issue: Were you speeding? That’s what you need to answer in court. Maybe you will get lucky and the officer will not show up to your hearing.
Walking_Paycheck | Apr 23, 2011


You were speeding, intentionally or unintentionally. Sorry but since you aren’t disputing that fact, then you will lose.
ArmyStrong | Apr 23, 2011


put that story before a court and they will double your fine, in a hurry and not paying attention will not impress them, if he doesn’t have video of the radar reading and he was stationary then he can’t have read your speed but winning a speeding ticket against a cop is rare unless you have a high paid lawyer
Harley Drive | Apr 23, 2011


If you were speeding, you were speeding and probably not on the best road conditions. You should have just paid the ticket. The only way you will avoid paying that ticket is if you can prove you were not speeding. Entrapment is when a police officer sets you up to commit a crime. The cop did not force you to speed. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time.
pennybarr | Apr 23, 2011


A nothing speeding stop ..pay the fine and be done you
will have a court hearing …
Uncle | Apr 23, 2011


Your intent s legally irrelevant. If the speed limit was 40, and you were at 60, then you are guilty.

He can hide, that’s not illegal. "Entrapment" is when the police convince you to commit a crime you would not otherwise have committed. All he did was hide and watch you.
Citicop | Apr 23, 2011


Once you request a court date you have to continue with that and pay the extra court fees. It also requires your driver’s license receive the penalty points. In my state paying in the mail cuts the penalty points in half and saves you the court fees.

You are not required to sign a ticket for infractions only misdemeanor crimes or worse. However, the officer is required to sign the court copy of the ticket.

Entrapment is when an officer tricks you into committing a crime
q S | Apr 23, 2011

NATO meetings: Foreign ministers from NATO's 28 member nations begin a two-day meeting in Berlin, Germany on Thursday with the alliance's military operations over Libya expected to be the first topic of discussions.

The 28 member states and six partner countries are enforcing United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, which calls for protection of civilians in the war between Libyan rebels and the regime of Moammar Gadhafi. NATO is enforcing a no-fly zone and arms embargo on Libya while conducting airstrikes on Gadhafi's forces.

Next on NATO's agenda will be discussions on Afghanistan, where NATO leads the International Security Assistance Force. Talks will focus on the alliance's role in Afghanistan after combat operations end, currently planned for 2014.

On Friday, NATO ministers plan sessions on partnerships and relations with the European Union, Georgia, Ukraine and Russia.

Severe weather:

Read more…

Why is there a stationary blob on the weather radar? | Top Travel …

This is called clutter or radar interference. It can be the result of a number of things that are getting picked up by the radar’s transmissions.

The little moving blob that always sticks around is a result of a long radar waveguide between the radar transceiver and the antenna. The rotating antenna will usually be seen as a sunburst in the centre of the display as the receiver responds to echoes from dust particles and misguided reflections. Some other issues include reflections from birds/bats, buildings, atmopheric turbulence, dust, elevation increases, etc..

Add your own answer in the comments!


This may help to explain

http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/radar/abou t/doppler_wind_images_intro.shtml

cnqaus | Jan 28, 2011


Scientists study tornadoes to gain a better understanding of their formation, behavior, and structure. Scientists who study tornadoes have a variety of powerful research tools at their disposal. Advances in computer technology make it possible to simulate the thunderstorms that spawn tornadoes using computer models running on desktop computers. Doppler radars, which detect the rain in clouds, allow meteorologists, scientists who study weather, to see the winds inside the storms that spawn tornadoes.
trey98607 | Jan 27, 2011

Recently I got a speeding ticket in Oceanside, CA, on Oceanside Blvd. on the stretch of road through the El Corazon area. It was a partly sunny day, clear visibility on an open road. There was no traffic (though I don’t remember if I was absolutely the only one on the road during that stretch of road.)

Traffic ticket VC 22349 (a)The officer wrote In the row of boxes: Speed Approx.">70", P.E./Max.spd. "55" Veh Limit "65" Safe "65 Radar "69". Verbally he told me he clocked me at 65, peaking at 69 using a laser.

When he asked if I knew the posted limit and how fast I was going and if I was in a hurry., I said I wasn’t exactly sure of the posted limit, but thought it was about 50 mph and I said that I didn’t think I was speeding, and was not in a hurry. I said that I just go with the flow of traffic and don’t look down at the speedometer frequently, so did not see exactly what my speed was at the time. He commented


I am afraid Kasey does not know math. That symbol means that the officer believes that you were at some point going over 70, however when he measured your speed with the radar it was 69 at that moment. (Less than 70 would be "speed < 70.") It does not matter what the safe speed was, because it is unlawful to exceed the maximum speed limit, which on surface streets is 55 unless otherwise posted, no matter how safe that might be. Your are being fined for going 15 mph over the limit

John S | Mar 16, 2011


The Speed Approx. >70 means less than 70. Probably a different/larger fine if you were going 70+. The radar box is showing the actual (your) speed of 69. Safe speed 65 could possibly mean exactly that. Safe to travel at that speed under normal road conditions, however still 10mph over the posted limit. As far as the verbal comments, he was just trying to see if you knew the speed or if you were in a hurry. If you said there was no traffic on the road, but you were going with the flow of
kaceypi | Mar 16, 2011


I am afraid Kasey does not know math. That symbol means that the officer believes that you were at some point going over 70, however when he measured your speed with the radar it was 69 at that moment. (Less than 70 would be "speed < 70.") It does not matter what the safe speed was, because it is unlawful to exceed the maximum speed limit, which on surface streets is 55 unless otherwise posted, no matter how safe that might be. Your are being fined for going 15 mph over the limit
John S | Mar 16, 2011


In California driving in excess of 65 mph is a violation of vehicle code section 22349 a provided you are driving on a multi-lane (more than one lane in each direction) roadway.

The notation on the ticket is not P.E../Max. Spd. The notation is P.F. which stands for Prima Fascia speed. The reason this is an important point in fighting this speeding ticket is that if you were on a multi-lane roadway the speed limit could have only been reduced to 55 mph based on a Traffic and Engineering
K | Mar 17, 2011

Powered by WordPress | Theme: Motion by 85ideas.